I was noodling over the weekend about a management tendency that I have observed many times over a 25-year career – the tendency to manage from what I call the “Comfortable Middle” of the “Management Spectrum“.
I wanted to create something visually to illustrate this, so I pulled up my Microsoft Paint program and off I went. Admittedly I’m no artist, but sometimes it really helps me to “draw” what I’m seeing in my head. That vision is what you see above.
What do I mean by the “Management Spectrum“? Quite simply, the full range of reward/penalty actions that a manager needs to exhibit to be the most effective manager.
On the left side of the spectrum is what I call “Touchy Feelyness“. I use that term because someone once accused me of “being too touchy feely“, when in actual fact (in my view) I was doing what I thought was right when it came to doling out praise, encouragement, and ultimately compensation – providing a LOT of it to the people who really were outperforming their peers and over delivering on all their promises.
On the other side is “Full Accountability“. That’s the ability of a manager to see and acknowledge that someone is under performing their responsibilities, and taking appropriate and decisive action to either change that behavior or let that person go altogether.
That brings us to the “Comfortable Middle” – I find that a lot of managers (myself included sometimes) like to stay in a range of the spectrum where nobody gets overpraised or overcompensated, or conversely, “written up” (a disciplinary action) or let go.
We think it’s comfortable because this part of the spectrum doesn’t generate any waves, or create many disruptions – nobody gets jealous or envious because some individuals are singled out with extravagant praise or a fantastic raise or bonus, and nobody works with much anxiety because its rare when somebody gets coached or let go, or doesn’t get a raise.
But the reality is, this “calmness” is only an illusion. What really happens when we live only in the comfortable middle is a bunch of resentment – resentment by those who excel for a lack of real and tangible recognition, and resentment by those who do their job well every day for those who don’t, and yet remain with the company and get the same raises they do.
The best objective indicator of how much a company lives in the comfortable middle is to look at the range of the annual raises – from my experience I know I need to get out of the middle when all the raises are bunched together, without much deviation from the highest to the lowest.
If someone lives in that middle for too long, then the problem multiplies, and your better performers start leaving, and your overall productivity stagnates.
I know how easy it is to stay away from the two ends of the spectrum, but we must really practice “Full Spectrum” management to truly be effective. Which means a manager must have the ability to be both “touchy feely” and “tough“.
Sounds Jeckyl and Hyde, but it’s really not.
It’s just being fair. And brave.
That little drawing is going to help me remember this every day, and I hope it can help you too.
Popularity: 7% [?]




Subscribe By RSS
Subscribe By E-mail
{ 1 trackback }
{ 10 comments… read them below or add one }
Hi Terry,
It’s been awhile since I stopped by. But this topic grabbed my attention right away.
I like your model of management, and agree that most managers find a “comfort zone” somewhere in the middle . . . and stay there much of the time.
Trouble is, managers can’t be monotone if they hope to be effective. Especially if they have more than one subordinate, because “one size does not fit all.”
Your point about resentment is a good one. Although people want fairness, they don’t want to be treated the same as the next guy. Sounds paradoxical, right? Well it is. And that’s one of the true challenges in management.
Best,
Terry
Hi Terry! I hope all is well with you these days – glad to hear from you.
Yes, it’s all too easy to stay in the comfortable middle, so it is indeed a challenge to really work the full spectrum.
Thanks for stopping by, and all the best!
Hey Terry!
I like your illustration! It seems to me that it takes courage, commitment, and authenticity to be a full spectrum manager. Thanks for sharing your thoughts and your visual.
Great Post! Keep up the excellent word.
Love & Gratitude,
Tina
Think Simple. Be Decisive.
~ Productivity, Motivation & Happiness
Hi Kirsten and Tina – thanks for stopping by.
Kirsten, I’m glad my visual made sense to you – and you have well summarized the three most important qualities of a full spectrum manager!
Tina, thanks for your kind words. And I like your blog – I especially like (and believe) the title. I’ll be happy to add it to my subscription list (and my blogroll)!
All the best to you both.
It’s annual review time and you’ve really given me some good food for thought, SB. I often find that the comfortable middle happens when I’m too busy to manage people because I’m busy working the process. Some good stuff to noodle here!
Hi Tom – ah yes, people versus process. The immortal struggle. One of these days I too will finally get to the full spectrum and put the people first. Keep trying we must!
Thanks, as always, for stopping by, and all the best.
Hi Terry
Great post – love the diagram.
You won’t be surprised to learn I am firmly in the camp that believes management is ALL ABOUT PEOPLE.
If we get the people thing right everything else falls into place. If we are not thinking people first in EVERYTHING we do then I think we can pack up and go home.
I am not saying process is not important – of course it is. I would say the mix in the most successful business is one gallon of passion and one pint of process. Most organisations I know have those proportions the wrong way round and then they wonder why there is no innovation and enthusiasm.
I sign up fully to the Tom Peters view that actually soft is hard. Any process management is simple – it’s a stroll in the park compared to the really difficult stuff which is always to do with people. How do we coach them to bring out the best in them? How can we help them? How can we get them signed up to our dream?
Through my entire career I have been accused of being too ‘soft and fluffy’ … it has been said to me that I am not ‘hard enough’ to be a Chief Executive …. I plead guilty to both charges proudly.
If you have to be ‘hard’ to be a CEO then forget it.
PS – Phew I feel better now Terry – thanks for the opportunity for my rant!! – I have made my comment a new posting on my Simplicity Blog!
Trevor! I love your comment – your passion came through loud and clear. I too always get my dander up when someone uses that “touchy feely” word with me. You bet soft is hard, and I think those who use such adjectives are always sitting in that “comfortable middle”.
Your “rants” are always welcome here Trevor – my very best thanks for taking the time to read and respond as you did. All the best!